Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,152,377 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from India communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from India within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from India corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,238 compared to $86,109, a difference of 44.3%), median male earnings ($74,207 compared to $51,489, a difference of 44.1%), and median household income ($113,009 compared to $79,103, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,804 compared to $59,248, a difference of 22.9%), median female earnings ($48,292 compared to $38,511, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($59,914 compared to $46,791, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (10.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 72.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (10.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 72.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.6%), single father poverty (14.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and single male poverty (10.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 45.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.7%), and married-couple households (52.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.27%), family households (67.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (22.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 39.6%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 41.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.1%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 5.2%), self-care disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.0%).