Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,174,636 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $41,986, a difference of 10.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $46,791, a difference of 7.0%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $97,737, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $86,109, a difference of 0.65%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and median household income ($78,327 compared to $79,103, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 13.8%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.63%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.61%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 3.5%).