Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,429,822 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to a decrease of 9.1 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $41,986, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $86,109, a difference of 36.1%), and median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $51,489, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $59,248, a difference of 17.9%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $46,791, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 31.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.61%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 34.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.9%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households (63.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 60.6%), master's degree (22.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 41.7%), and doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 36.3%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 3.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.0%).