Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,932,980 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 16.0 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $46,791, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,533 compared to $86,109, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($83,304 compared to $79,103, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $51,489, a difference of 0.20%), median family income ($97,222 compared to $97,737, a difference of 0.53%), and median earnings ($45,090 compared to $44,767, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 25.2%), receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.6%), family households (65.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%).