Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,973,561 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $46,791, a difference of 16.9%), wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $59,248, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $51,489, a difference of 0.30%), per capita income ($41,709 compared to $41,986, a difference of 0.66%), and median earnings ($45,532 compared to $44,767, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.9%), and married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.21%), single female poverty (22.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 36.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.7%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), currently married (43.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 147.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 20.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.0%).