Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,296,029 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.219% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 218.5 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $46,938, a difference of 17.3%), median family income ($123,831 compared to $110,159, a difference of 12.4%), and median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $58,835, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $64,521, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $50,729, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.3%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.5%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.30, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.18%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.18%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%).