Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,782,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $101,124, a difference of 27.7%), median household income ($116,460 compared to $91,887, a difference of 26.7%), and median male earnings ($74,031 compared to $58,835, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $50,729, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,051 compared to $64,521, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 58.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.4%), divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (68.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.4%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 30.6%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.2%).