Asian vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,786,602 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $50,729, a difference of 12.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $101,124, a difference of 11.4%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $91,887, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.2%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $46,938, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $64,521, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.42%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.30, a difference of 0.48%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.6%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.2%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and bachelor's degree (44.4% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.4%).