Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,954,150 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.889. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.229% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 229.2 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $50,729, a difference of 6.8%), per capita income ($49,983 compared to $46,938, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $101,124, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $64,521, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $108,471, a difference of 4.0%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.6%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.71%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.0%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 61.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 6.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.2%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%).