Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,482,413 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.108% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 108.0 Immigrants from India.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $124,238, a difference of 53.6%), median male earnings ($48,317 compared to $74,207, a difference of 53.6%), and wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $59,914, a difference of 24.9%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $48,292, a difference of 27.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $72,804, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 104.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 83.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 83.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 71.6%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 64.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.0%), family households (62.0% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 90.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.5%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.77%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 59.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 6.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.2%).