Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,316,033 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 16.0 Immigrants from India.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $74,207, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $132,488, a difference of 44.9%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $134,028, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $59,914, a difference of 11.5%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $48,292, a difference of 25.0%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $55,268, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 104.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 85.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 45.0%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 47.4%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 44.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.6%), family households (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 191.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 50.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 20.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 46.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 100.9%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 78.5%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 5.0%).