Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,557,897 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.160% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 159.8 Immigrants from India.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $74,207, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $124,238, a difference of 26.9%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $113,009, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $72,804, a difference of 14.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $59,914, a difference of 15.4%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $48,292, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 39.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.5%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 32.5%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.50%), family households (63.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.5%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and bachelor's degree (42.6% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%).