Pima vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from India
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from India

Poor
Exceptional
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,255
SOCIAL INDEX
100/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
1st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from India Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,545,277 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.967. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 90.2 Immigrants from India.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from India Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from India Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $132,488, a difference of 80.6%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $55,268, a difference of 80.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $113,009, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $59,914, a difference of 16.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $48,292, a difference of 36.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $72,804, a difference of 44.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from India Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from India
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$55,268
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$134,028
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$113,009
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$60,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$74,207
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$48,292
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$59,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$124,238
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$132,488
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$72,804
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
31.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from India Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 213.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 194.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 173.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 62.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 72.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from India Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from India
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
23.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
7.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from India Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 212.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 150.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 146.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from India Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from India
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
3.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
4.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from India Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from India Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from India
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
67.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
84.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from India Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 124.9%), single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 120.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.21, a difference of 16.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from India Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from India
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
31.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
52.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Poor
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
51.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
22.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from India Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 73.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 14.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from India Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from India
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Average
6.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from India Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 141.2%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 121.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 114.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Pima vs Immigrants from India Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from India
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
89.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
74.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
69.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
58.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
51.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
22.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from India Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 97.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 96.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 94.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 23.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from India Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from India
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
19.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%