Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,188,720 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 29.8 Immigrants from India.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $74,207, a difference of 56.3%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $134,028, a difference of 51.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,108 compared to $132,488, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $59,914, a difference of 12.5%), median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $48,292, a difference of 34.1%), and wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 133.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 94.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 81.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.9%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 65.9%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.21, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 108.3%), master's degree (11.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 88.4%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 77.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.0%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.8%).