Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,686,225 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.409% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 408.5 Immigrants from India.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $74,207, a difference of 20.8%), median household income ($93,602 compared to $113,009, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $132,488, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,914 compared to $55,268, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $48,292, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $72,804, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 18.3%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.2%), family households with children (25.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 48.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.8%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and bachelor's degree (45.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.8%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.7%).