Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,999,797 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.988% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 988.4 Immigrants from India.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,308 compared to $132,488, a difference of 11.1%), and median household income ($102,562 compared to $113,009, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($46,573 compared to $48,292, a difference of 3.7%), per capita income ($57,953 compared to $55,268, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $72,804, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.3%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 69.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.1%), master's degree (20.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and bachelor's degree (48.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.7%).