Belgian vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,884,803 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.706. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.193% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to an increase of 192.6 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 15.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,915 compared to $55,986, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,262 compared to $88,819, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $50,565, a difference of 0.90%), median female earnings ($38,382 compared to $38,886, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($46,375 compared to $45,600, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.3%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%), married-couple households (48.0% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.060%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.9%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.52%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.86%).