Jordanian vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,648,845 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 33.3 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $94,288, a difference of 16.0%), median household income ($91,794 compared to $79,888, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $55,986, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $50,565, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $38,886, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($45,605 compared to $42,278, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.50%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 8.9%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.9%), currently married (48.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (65.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.2%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.8%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 4.8%).