Norwegian vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,694,615 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 22.2 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $94,288, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $55,986, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $38,886, a difference of 0.22%), median earnings ($46,865 compared to $45,600, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $50,565, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.2%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and currently married (50.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 54.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%).