Asian vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,456,518 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $79,888, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $88,819, a difference of 26.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $94,288, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $50,565, a difference of 12.7%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $38,886, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 25.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.25%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.15, a difference of 4.1%), currently married (48.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (66.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.2%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.31%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%).