Burmese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,281,822 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $79,888, a difference of 29.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $94,288, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $88,819, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $50,565, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $38,886, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.4%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.38%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 57.6%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 53.5%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.2%).