Mongolian vs French Community Comparison

COMPARE

Mongolian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
French
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Mongolians

French

Good
Average
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

French Integration in Mongolian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,154,905 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.499% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 498.6 French.
Mongolian Integration in French Communities

Mongolian vs French Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and French communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,971 compared to $83,468, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($49,173 compared to $43,685, a difference of 12.6%), and median family income ($114,553 compared to $102,368, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $51,230, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $55,350, a difference of 9.0%).
Mongolian vs French Income
Income MetricMongolianFrench
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,173
Average
$43,685
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,553
Average
$102,368
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,971
Fair
$83,468
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,038
Average
$46,296
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,350
Good
$55,350
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,542
Tragic
$38,457
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,540
Tragic
$51,230
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,578
Fair
$93,665
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,602
Average
$99,824
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,326
Fair
$59,656
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Tragic
28.7%

Mongolian vs French Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and French communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.2%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Mongolian vs French Poverty
Poverty MetricMongolianFrench
Poverty
Average
12.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Average
13.4%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.1%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Good
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Good
16.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
30.7%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.7%

Mongolian vs French Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.65%).
Mongolian vs French Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMongolianFrench
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%

Mongolian vs French Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Mongolian vs French Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMongolianFrench
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
42.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
82.2%

Mongolian vs French Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and French communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 19.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Mongolian vs French Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMongolianFrench
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
33.4%

Mongolian vs French Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 76.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.2%).
Mongolian vs French Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMongolianFrench
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
6.9%

Mongolian vs French Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and French communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.3%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.4%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%).
Mongolian vs French Education Level
Education Level MetricMongolianFrench
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
89.9%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Fair
58.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.0%
Fair
45.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.4%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.4%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Average
1.8%

Mongolian vs French Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.2%).
Mongolian vs French Disability
Disability MetricMongolianFrench
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%