Immigrants from Belarus vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,132,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 6.6 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and French communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $38,457, a difference of 16.4%), per capita income ($50,303 compared to $43,685, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $93,665, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $59,656, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $51,230, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and French communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 23.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.59%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 26.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and French communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 30.4%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 125.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 11.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 37.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and French communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.6%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.6%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 65.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.27%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.4%).