Lithuanian vs French Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
French
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

French

Excellent
Average
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

French Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,037,207 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 234.5 French.
Lithuanian Integration in French Communities

Lithuanian vs French Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $43,685, a difference of 13.2%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $102,368, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $99,824, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.20%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $51,230, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $59,656, a difference of 9.3%).
Lithuanian vs French Income
Income MetricLithuanianFrench
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Average
$43,685
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Average
$102,368
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Fair
$83,468
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Average
$46,296
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Good
$55,350
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Tragic
$38,457
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Tragic
$51,230
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Fair
$93,665
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Average
$99,824
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Fair
$59,656
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
28.7%

Lithuanian vs French Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 16.9%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.0%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.7%).
Lithuanian vs French Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianFrench
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Good
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Good
16.0%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
30.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.7%

Lithuanian vs French Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Lithuanian vs French Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianFrench
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Poor
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%

Lithuanian vs French Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Lithuanian vs French Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianFrench
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
42.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
82.2%

Lithuanian vs French Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 13.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.15%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.49%).
Lithuanian vs French Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianFrench
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
33.4%

Lithuanian vs French Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Lithuanian vs French Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianFrench
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
6.9%

Lithuanian vs French Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.7%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
Lithuanian vs French Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianFrench
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Fair
58.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Fair
45.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
1.8%

Lithuanian vs French Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.6%).
Lithuanian vs French Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianFrench
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%