New Zealander vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,148,245 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.767. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.345% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 344.7 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $45,858, a difference of 10.3%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $87,769, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $62,230, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $52,336, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $104,560, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.1%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.050%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.54%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.4%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.6%).