Pima vs Canadian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Canadian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Canadians
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,303
SOCIAL INDEX
70.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
123rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Canadian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,508,545 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 181.8 Canadians.
Pima vs Canadian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,858, a difference of 49.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $104,560, a difference of 42.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $87,769, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,336, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,724, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,625, a difference of 17.9%).
Income Metric | Pima | Canadian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $45,858 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Excellent $106,597 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Excellent $87,769 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Excellent $47,911 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $57,286 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Average $39,724 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Average $52,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Excellent $97,625 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Excellent $104,560 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Good $62,230 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 28.1% |
Pima vs Canadian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 151.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 124.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 112.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 44.0%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Canadian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Good 16.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Average 29.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Pima vs Canadian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 156.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 122.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 99.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Canadian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Pima vs Canadian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 11.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Canadian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 40.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Poor 82.4% |
Pima vs Canadian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 83.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 61.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.12%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Canadian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Average 31.9% |
Pima vs Canadian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 69.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 12.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Canadian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Pima vs Canadian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 69.6%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 67.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Canadian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.4% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Good 47.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Good 38.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Excellent 15.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Pima vs Canadian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 68.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.7%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Canadian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.5% |