Arapaho vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,251,573 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.341. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 14.9 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,858, a difference of 41.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $104,560, a difference of 37.7%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $57,286, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $62,230, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $52,336, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.5%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 54.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.8%), single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 143.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 132.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 125.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 47.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.6%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%).