Native/Alaskan vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,594,272 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $45,858, a difference of 37.8%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $106,597, a difference of 31.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $104,560, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $52,336, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $39,724, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 80.2%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 74.2%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 25.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 57.9%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.7%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.4%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 58.2%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 57.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%).