Native/Alaskan vs Bermudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,899,309 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Bermudans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $42,911, a difference of 28.9%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $97,577, a difference of 20.6%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $80,406, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $47,359, a difference of 0.73%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $58,171, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 57.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 49.6%), and single male poverty (19.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 15.8%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.6%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (42.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 55.2%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 47.6%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.8%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.9%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%).