Native Hawaiian vs Bermudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,015,973 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 15.5 Bermudans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $58,171, a difference of 22.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $47,359, a difference of 16.5%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $80,406, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $52,465, a difference of 0.30%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $45,593, a difference of 1.3%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $39,418, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.20, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 67.1%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 66.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 40.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.7%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 0.20%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%).