Native Hawaiian vs Aleut Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,528,086 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 39.0 Aleuts.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $62,708, a difference of 13.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $50,377, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $83,446, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,719, a difference of 0.67%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $44,241, a difference of 1.8%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $51,168, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 27.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 50.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.0%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (47.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 69.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (43.1% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 8.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (95.9% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).