Hawaiian vs Aleut Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,935,242 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Aleuts.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $42,210, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $50,377, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($98,869 compared to $98,702, a difference of 0.17%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $91,370, a difference of 0.71%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $100,052, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.1%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and female poverty (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 46.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.96%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 18.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and family households (67.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.13%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 62.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and associate's degree (40.9% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.090%), college, 1 year or more (55.6% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.19%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 2.8%).