Luxembourger vs Aleut Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Aleuts

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Aleut Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,187,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 12.0 Aleuts.
Luxembourger Integration in Aleut Communities

Luxembourger vs Aleut Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 15.5%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $51,168, a difference of 10.0%), and per capita income ($45,663 compared to $42,210, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $50,377, a difference of 0.010%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $62,708, a difference of 2.9%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $38,719, a difference of 3.0%).
Luxembourger vs Aleut Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerAleut
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Poor
$42,210
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Poor
$98,702
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Fair
$83,446
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$44,241
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$51,168
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Poor
$38,719
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$50,377
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Poor
$91,370
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Average
$100,052
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Excellent
$62,708
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.7%

Luxembourger vs Aleut Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 35.8%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.30%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.5%).
Luxembourger vs Aleut Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerAleut
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
16.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
12.4%

Luxembourger vs Aleut Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 58.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 55.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.3%).
Luxembourger vs Aleut Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerAleut
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
21.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.4%

Luxembourger vs Aleut Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Luxembourger vs Aleut Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerAleut
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.0%

Luxembourger vs Aleut Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 33.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.1%).
Luxembourger vs Aleut Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerAleut
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Poor
45.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
39.3%

Luxembourger vs Aleut Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 143.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 8.4%).
Luxembourger vs Aleut Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerAleut
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
13.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
87.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.9%

Luxembourger vs Aleut Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.7%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 7th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Luxembourger vs Aleut Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerAleut
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Average
85.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
55.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
39.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Aleut Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.9%).
Luxembourger vs Aleut Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerAleut
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
28.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%