Burmese vs Slovak Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slovak
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Slovaks

Exceptional
Good
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,550
SOCIAL INDEX
63.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
150th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slovak Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 359,514,196 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Slovaks.
Burmese Integration in Slovak Communities

Burmese vs Slovak Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $83,798, a difference of 23.1%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $59,039, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $101,029, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $49,753, a difference of 10.1%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,029, a difference of 15.1%).
Burmese vs Slovak Income
Income MetricBurmeseSlovak
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Good
$44,229
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Good
$103,729
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Fair
$83,798
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Good
$47,095
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Excellent
$56,306
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Poor
$39,029
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$49,753
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Average
$95,032
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Average
$101,029
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Poor
$59,039
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.9%

Burmese vs Slovak Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 33.3%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.0%), male poverty (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and poverty (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Burmese vs Slovak Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseSlovak
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Fair
17.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Excellent
15.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Fair
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
30.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
10.8%

Burmese vs Slovak Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Burmese vs Slovak Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseSlovak
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Burmese vs Slovak Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
Burmese vs Slovak Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseSlovak
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
42.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Burmese vs Slovak Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 26.6%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Burmese vs Slovak Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseSlovak
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
25.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.06
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
33.4%

Burmese vs Slovak Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.32%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Burmese vs Slovak Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseSlovak
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Average
6.3%

Burmese vs Slovak Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.3%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 45.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.66%).
Burmese vs Slovak Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseSlovak
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
96.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Fair
64.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Average
14.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Fair
1.8%

Burmese vs Slovak Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 51.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.2%).
Burmese vs Slovak Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseSlovak
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
45.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
2.5%