Pima vs Slovak Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,685,837 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 96.4 Slovaks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,229, a difference of 44.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $101,029, a difference of 37.7%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $49,753, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,029, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,032, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 183.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 132.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 126.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 26.9%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 149.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.2%), and female unemployment (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 86.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 54.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.2%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 71.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 61.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 60.9%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.49%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 71.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 60.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 3.0%).