Houma vs Slovak Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,993,965 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 115.0 Slovaks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $101,029, a difference of 40.1%), median family income ($76,188 compared to $103,729, a difference of 36.1%), and per capita income ($32,996 compared to $44,229, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $56,306, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $49,753, a difference of 12.2%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $47,095, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 85.0%), single male poverty (23.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 66.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 28.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 34.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 66.5%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 39.5%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.06, a difference of 3.7%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 107.5%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 92.9%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 54.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.8%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 17.5%).