Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Liberian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,746,945 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Liberians within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Liberians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 18.1 Liberians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,856 compared to $82,005, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $48,917, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $54,356, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $88,929, a difference of 2.7%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $91,722, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 35.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.2%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (40.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (41.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 98.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 15.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.5%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.70%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%).