Burmese vs Liberian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Liberian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Liberians

Exceptional
Poor
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Liberian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,988,034 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Liberians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Liberians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Liberians.
Burmese Integration in Liberian Communities

Burmese vs Liberian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $82,005, a difference of 38.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $88,929, a difference of 36.6%), and median household income ($103,145 compared to $75,667, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $48,917, a difference of 12.0%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $38,215, a difference of 17.5%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $43,536, a difference of 25.3%).
Burmese vs Liberian Income
Income MetricBurmeseLiberian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$38,780
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$91,722
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$75,667
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$43,536
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$49,318
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$38,215
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$48,917
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$82,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$88,929
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$54,356
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
21.4%

Burmese vs Liberian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 71.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 52.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Burmese vs Liberian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseLiberian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
20.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
14.8%

Burmese vs Liberian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.7%).
Burmese vs Liberian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseLiberian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%

Burmese vs Liberian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Burmese vs Liberian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseLiberian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
67.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Excellent
83.0%

Burmese vs Liberian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 63.4%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 41.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.79%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (65.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 6.1%).
Burmese vs Liberian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseLiberian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
40.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
37.4%

Burmese vs Liberian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.9%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.5%).
Burmese vs Liberian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseLiberian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
12.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
5.3%

Burmese vs Liberian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 73.4%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 73.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.3% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.41%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
Burmese vs Liberian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseLiberian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
88.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
56.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
43.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Burmese vs Liberian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 40.5%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.6%).
Burmese vs Liberian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseLiberian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
25.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%