Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,478,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to a decrease of 7.9 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $78,045, a difference of 17.0%), median household income ($83,327 compared to $71,801, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $85,207, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,810 compared to $36,017, a difference of 7.7%), per capita income ($42,289 compared to $38,848, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 19.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.2% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 12.7%), currently married (45.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and associate's degree (45.1% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.050%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.41%).