British West Indian vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,702,759 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $45,529, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $36,017, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($88,987 compared to $89,285, a difference of 0.33%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $85,207, a difference of 0.43%), and per capita income ($40,330 compared to $38,848, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 45.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.7%), and receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.82%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 53.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 43.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 39.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 165.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 26.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.9%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%).