Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,499,646 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 15.9 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 37.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $45,529, a difference of 19.8%), and median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $36,017, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($89,249 compared to $89,285, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $85,207, a difference of 0.40%), and per capita income ($41,123 compared to $38,848, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 48.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 39.7%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.1%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 64.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 45.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 60.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.9%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (62.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 234.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 86.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 83.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 41.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 79.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 83.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.6%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.9%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.020%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.9%).