Asian vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,427,591 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $51,705, a difference of 10.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $105,748, a difference of 6.5%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $95,800, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $62,899, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $67,234, a difference of 2.4%), and per capita income ($50,057 compared to $51,465, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.010%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (48.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.6%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and college, under 1 year (69.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%).