Lithuanian vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,487,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 120.7 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $51,465, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $51,705, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $67,234, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $112,886, a difference of 0.36%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $105,748, a difference of 0.50%), and median family income ($115,395 compared to $116,286, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.7%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.19%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.8%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.5%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.56%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.3%).