Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from South Africa

Poor
Exceptional
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,269
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
25th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Africa Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,832,428 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.343% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 342.8 Immigrants from South Africa.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from South Africa Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $51,465, a difference of 67.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $112,886, a difference of 53.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $95,800, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,705, a difference of 0.39%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,508, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $105,748, a difference of 27.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from South Africa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$51,465
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$116,286
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$95,800
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$51,850
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$62,899
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$42,508
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Fair
$51,705
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$105,748
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$112,886
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$67,234
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
28.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 153.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 127.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 108.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 36.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 37.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from South Africa
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
9.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 159.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 120.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from South Africa
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from South Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Fair
74.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Average
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Average
82.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 100.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 75.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from South Africa
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
29.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from South Africa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Average
19.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Fair
6.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 102.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 92.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 85.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from South Africa
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
70.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
65.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
52.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 78.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 61.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from South Africa Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from South Africa
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%