Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from North Macedonia

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,559
SOCIAL INDEX
83.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
64th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from North Macedonia Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,838,083 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 37.4 Immigrants from North Macedonia.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from North Macedonia Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,622, a difference of 48.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $105,892, a difference of 44.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $89,741, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $56,503, a difference of 9.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,488, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $100,101, a difference of 20.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from North Macedonia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$45,622
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$109,136
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$89,741
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$49,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$59,189
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Excellent
$40,488
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$56,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$100,101
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$105,892
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Average
$61,175
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
28.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 149.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 138.9%), and male poverty (20.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 115.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 61.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from North Macedonia
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
18.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 161.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 123.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from North Macedonia
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
11.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from North Macedonia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 105.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 82.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from North Macedonia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
28.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from North Macedonia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
10.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 68.9%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 64.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.080%).
Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from North Macedonia
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Excellent
39.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 79.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from North Macedonia
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%