Portuguese vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,255,453 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 34.0 Immigrants from North Macedonia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $59,189, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $56,503, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $61,175, a difference of 0.43%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $105,892, a difference of 0.55%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $100,101, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.59%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.4%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.5%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.74%), and family households (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.1%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 10.5%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.6%).