Argentinean vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,904,702 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 35.7 Immigrants from North Macedonia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $45,622, a difference of 9.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $61,175, a difference of 6.7%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($50,399 compared to $49,658, a difference of 1.5%), median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $59,189, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $100,101, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.41%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 42.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.5%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.7%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%).