Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Immigrants from North Macedonia

Average
Excellent
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,559
SOCIAL INDEX
83.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
64th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from North Macedonia Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,318,032 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.986. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 57.4 Immigrants from North Macedonia.
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from North Macedonia Communities

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $59,189, a difference of 21.2%), wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $49,658, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $100,101, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $40,488, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $56,503, a difference of 3.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Income
Income MetricTsimshianImmigrants from North Macedonia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Exceptional
$45,622
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Exceptional
$109,136
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$89,741
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Exceptional
$49,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Exceptional
$59,189
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Excellent
$40,488
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Exceptional
$56,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Exceptional
$100,101
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Exceptional
$105,892
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Average
$61,175
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
28.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 58.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.3%), and single father poverty (12.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianImmigrants from North Macedonia
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.0%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 162.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 88.7%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 67.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianImmigrants from North Macedonia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
11.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianImmigrants from North Macedonia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
83.9%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 49.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianImmigrants from North Macedonia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
28.1%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from North Macedonia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
10.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 36.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.86%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianImmigrants from North Macedonia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Excellent
39.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 91.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 62.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.3%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from North Macedonia
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%