Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,168,030 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.377. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $77,328, a difference of 54.5%), median family income ($125,312 compared to $83,618, a difference of 49.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $82,697, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $48,267, a difference of 20.7%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $34,647, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 74.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 72.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.1%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 60.3%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 55.6%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 113.3%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 89.0%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.79%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.0%).