Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,496,734 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.156% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 155.6 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 12.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $48,267, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $82,697, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,260 compared to $77,328, a difference of 0.090%), median earnings ($40,107 compared to $40,195, a difference of 0.22%), and median female earnings ($34,106 compared to $34,647, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 16.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.89%), male poverty (14.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and poverty (15.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.8%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.26%), births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.87%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.7%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (50.5% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 1.1%), college, under 1 year (57.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.2%), hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.2%).